Ex Parte SERETTI et al - Page 17



          Appeal No. 2002-1475                                      Page 17           
          Application No. 09/370,935                                                  

          the trade-in of vehicles, because the dealer would put out a                
          quote for the value of the vehicle and receive a response from at           
          least one vendor.  Because the dealer could put out a request for           
          quotation and a vendor will provide a response, we find that                
          Giovannoli suggests exchanging vehicular data among a plurality             
          of vehicle dealership users.  From all of the above, we affirm              
          the rejection of claim 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                         
















                                     CONCLUSION                                       







Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007