Ex Parte CORLISS - Page 10




          Appeal No. 2002-1761                                                        
          Application No. 09/169,757                                                  


          As explained supra, the portion of Pepe cited by the examiner               
          does not teach or suggest the routing of messages over an                   
          Internet gateway for informing a subscriber that there is a voice           
          mail message waiting.  That portion of Pepe does disclose that a            
          subscriber may receive a message regarding receipt of a voice               
          mail message, but that notification appears to come from a pager,           
          i.e., a wireless network, not, necessarily, via the Internet.               
          Most certainly, there is no suggestion in that portion of Pepe on           
          which the examiner relies, of generating a Short Message Service            
          message notification and routing that type of message over a                
          local Internet gateway, as required by independent claim 1.                 
          Accordingly, the examiner’s combination of Pepe with Amin will              
          not result in the instant claimed subject matter.                           















                                        -10–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007