Ex Parte MOLDENHAUER et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1875                                                        
          Application 09/245,776                                                      

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention relates to a computer program product that a             
          user may use to obtain assistance and order completion when                 
          serving a customer.                                                         
               Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                           
                    1.  A computer program product on a computer readable             
               medium for use in providing assistance and order completion            
               to a user when serving a customer, comprising:                         
                    (a) a graphical user interface having a home page and a           
               plurality of additional pages including an order entry page            
               for the customer's order; and                                          
                    (b) a set of queries for the user to ask the customer,            
               the responses to which are entered by the user and are used            
               to automatically populate the order entry page.                        

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
               Tarumi et al. (Tarumi)    5,880,974           March 9, 1999            
          (filed October 18, 1996)                                                    
               Cupps et al. (Cupps)      5,991,739       November 23, 1999            
          (filed November 24, 1997)                                                   
               Taylor et al. (Taylor)    6,034,687           March 7, 2000            
          (filed May 26, 1995)                                                        

               Claims 1-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being            
          anticipated by Cupps.                                                       
               Claims 9, 11, 15-18, and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by Taylor.                                    
               Claims 12-14 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Taylor and Tarumi.                               
               We refer to the final rejection (Paper No. 6) (pages                   
          referred to as "FR__") and the examiner's answer (Paper No. 16)             
                                        - 2 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007