Ex Parte BYRNE et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2002-1894                                                                                    
             Application No. 09/195,870                                                                              



                    for each directory object, maintaining in a table the identify of an                             
                    entry that holds the directory object’s ACL and the entry that holds                             
                    the directory object’s owner information; and                                                    
                    responsive to a directory operation, using information in the table                              
                    to identify ACL and owner information for a particular directory object.                         

                    The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                    
                    Fabbio                      5,335,346                  Aug.  2, 1994                             
                    Bsaibes et al. (Bsaibes)         5,701,458      Dec. 23, 1997                                    
                    Claims 1 through 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over           
             Bsaibes in view of Fabbio.                                                                              
                    Reference is made to the final rejection (paper number 8), the briefs (paper numbers 13          
             and 15) and the answer (paper number 14) for the respective positions of the appellants and the         
             examiner.                                                                                               
                                                     OPINION                                                         
                    We have carefully considered the entire record before us, and we will reverse the                
             obviousness rejection of claims 1 through 29.                                                           
                    All of the claims on appeal require that a table maintain for each directory object the          
             identity of an entry that holds the directory object’s ACL, and the entry that holds the directory      
             object’s owner information so that, in response to a directory operation, the information in the        
             table is used to identify ACL and owner information for a particular directory object.                  

                                                         -2-                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007