The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID J. BOOTHBY
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1905
Application No. 09/240,563
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 22
through 27.
The disclosed invention relates to a data processing method
for synchronizing the data records of a plurality of disparate
databases.
Claim 22 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it
reads as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007