Appeal No. 2002-1922
Application No. 09/163,724
Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads
as follows:
1. A computer system including at least one client computer
having a processing capability and communicating one or more data
requests to at least one web server of a web site, the web server
having access to server data, comprising:
logic means for selectively causing server data to be
processed at the client computer or at the web site, based at least
in part on the processing capability of the client computer, the
processing of the server data rendering a formatted data structure;
and
logic means for causing the server data to be processed at the
web site when a data request from the client computer indicates
that the web server is to process server data to render a formatted
data structure, regardless of the processing capability of the
client computer.
The references relied on by the examiner are:
Tso et al. (Tso) 6,185,625 Feb. 6, 2001
(filed Dec. 20, 1996)
Purcell 6,233,584 May 15, 2001
(filed Sept. 9, 1997)
Claims 1 through 8, 10, 11 and 14 through 24 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Tso in view of
Purcell.
Reference is made to the supplemental brief (paper number 12),
the answer (paper number 13) and the reply brief (paper number 14)
for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007