Ex Parte KRAMER - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-2067                                                        
          Application No. 09/411,730                                                  

          outside of the vehicle to make a visual inspection of the                   
          components.                                                                 

               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
               1.  A method of actuating electrical components of a vehicle           
          for performing diagnostic analysis on the electrical components,            
          said method comprising:                                                     
               relaying a signal from a remote transmitter to a receiver              
          aboard a vehicle;                                                           
               actuating a plurality of electrical components on the                  
          vehicle in response to the signal from the transmitter; and                 
               visually inspecting the actuation of said plurality of                 
          electrical components from the location of said remote                      
          transmitter.                                                                
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Wallace        5,684,337                        Nov. 4,  1997               
          Ostermann et al. (Ostermann)    5,798,576       Aug. 25, 1998               
          Doyle et al. (Doyle)            5,850,188       Dec. 15, 1998               
          Traub          6,265,878                        Jul. 24, 2001               
                         (filed Oct. 2, 1998)                                         
               Claims 1-5, 7, 8 and 10-18 stand rejected under                        
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Doyle.  Claims 6, 9, 16 and            
          19-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                 
          obviousness, the examiner cites Doyle in view of either one of              
          Ostermann or Wallace with regard to claims 6, 9 and 16; with                
          regard to claims 19-21, the examiner cites Doyle and Traub.                 
                                         -2–                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007