Ex Parte NAGATA et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication and is not                       
               binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                               Paper No. 15           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                    Ex parte TOSHIYUKI NAGATA, HIROYUKI YOSHIDA,                      
          MASAYUKI MOROI and ATSUSHI SATOH                                            
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2002-2072                                  
                             Application No. 09/332,360                               
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     
          Before KRASS, FLEMING and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1, 3 and 4.                                                          
               The invention is directed to a random access memory, best              
          illustrated by reference to representative independent claim 1,             
          reproduced as follows:                                                      

                                         -1–                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007