Ex Parte MILILLO et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2002-2191                                                                              
            Application No. 09/354,482                                                                        

                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   The invention relates to a disk caching system within a mass data storage                  
            system.  The cache control processor receives a cache bitmap from the host computer               
            to specify the data blocks from the mass storage device to be pre-staged into the cache           
            memory.  Representative claim 1 is reproduced below.                                              
                   1.    A method for providing a client-directed pre-stage operation of a cache              
                   memory used to access data blocks from a mass data storage device attached to              
                   a host computer through a channel control processor, the method comprising:                
                         transmitting a bitmap from the host computer to the channel control                  
                   processor, the bitmap comprises a plurality of bits;                                       
                         causing the channel control processor to pre-stage into the cache memory             
                   data blocks from the mass data storage device corresponding to enabled bits in             
                   the bitmap; and                                                                            
                         retrieving one or more bytes of data from the data blocks pre-staged into            
                   the cache memory.                                                                          
                   The examiner relies on the following reference:                                            
            Drewry et al. (Drewry)                 5,925,100                 Jul. 20, 1999                    
                                                                       (filed Mar. 21, 1996)                  
                   Claims 1-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                   
            Drewry.                                                                                           
                   We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 6) and the Examiner’s Answer (Paper             
            No. 11) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No. 10) for            
            appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand rejected.                             



                                                     -2-                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007