Ex Parte PATWARDHAN et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2002-2195                                                                              
            Application No. 08/988,616                                                                        

                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   The invention is directed to a method for accessing data in a microcode ROM in             
            a microprocessor for the purpose of checking for memory faults.  Representative claim             
            60 is reproduced below.                                                                           
                   60.   A method for reading data from a microcode ROM in a microprocessor,                  
                   the method comprising:                                                                     
                   invoking an instruction fetch to retrieve data from a predetermined address in the         
                         microcode ROM; and                                                                   
                   suppressing execution of the data retrieved from the predetermined address in              
                         the microcode ROM in response to a signal indicating a test mode,                    
                         regardless of whether the data retrieved comprises a branch or non-                  
                         branch instruction.                                                                  

                   The examiner relies on the following reference:                                            
            Sawase et al. (Sawase)                 5,175,840                 Dec. 29, 1992                    
                   Claims 60-76 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                  
            Sawase.                                                                                           
                   We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 27) and the Examiner’s Answer                   
            (Paper No. 31) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No.             
            30) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand rejected.                     


                                                  OPINION                                                     
                   In accordance with appellants’ proposed grouping of the claims (Brief at 7), we            
            select claims 60 and 67 as representative of the invention.  See 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7).            
                                                     -2-                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007