Ex Parte FRIMOUT et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-2327                                                        
          Application No. 09/142,549                                                  

          conventional MPEG encoding in which a copy protection bit is used           
          for authentication purposes, Appellants’ invention involves the             
          purposeful generation of a sequence of intraframe (I),                      
          predictively (P), and bidirectionally (B) coded pictures in a               
          group of pictures (GOP).  For example, a BPP pattern, rarely used           
          in a GOP structure, is used to represent watermark data in a                
          digital signal encoded in MPEG format.                                      
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
                    1.    A method of embedding supplemental data in a                
               video signal comprising the step:                                      
                    encoding the video signal in groups of pictures                   
               comprising an intraframe (I) coded picture and a series of             
               predictively (P) and bidirectionally predictively (B) coded            
               pictures, characterized in that said method further                    
               comprises the step:                                                    
               further encoding the video signal in such a                            
               manner that the pattern of picture coding types (I, P, B) in           
               a group of pictures represents a supplemental data value.              
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Iu                            5,293,229           Mar. 08, 1994             
          Girod et al. (Girod)          5,809,139           Sep. 15, 1998             
                                                  (filed Sep. 13, 1996)               
               Claim 1-11, all of the appealed claims, stand finally                  
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Iu             
          in view of Girod.                                                           

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007