Ex Parte MACCORMACK - Page 8



          Appeal No. 2003-0031                                                         
          Application No. 09/240,176                                                   


          least one of the buffers 770-778 while each of channels 1, 2, and            
          3 is able to only read from at least one the buffers 770-778.  In            
          addressing the language of claims 12, 13, 15, the Examiner again             
          relies on the interpretation of Osborne that suggests that, since            
          the same buffer can store and retrieve data at different times,              
          the claimed limitations are satisfied.  Similar to our earlier               
          discussion, we do not see any reasonable interpretation of                   
          Osborne that would support the conclusion that, merely because a             
          single buffer may be used to store and retrieve data at different            
          times, a limitation that restricts particular channels to a read             
          or a write operation to at least one of a plurality of buffers               
          would be met.                                                                












                                           8                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007