Appeal No. 2003-0288
Application No. 09/107,920
The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claim 6 is
reversed because the graphical processing teachings of Gentile do
not cure the noted shortcomings in the teachings of Cyman and
Maruyama.
For all of the reasons expressed supra in connection with
independent claim 8, and dependent claim 6, the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of dependent claim 13 is reversed.
For all of the reasons expressed supra in connection with
independent claim 15, and dependent claim 6, the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of dependent claim 17 is reversed.
The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims
19 through 22 is reversed because the teachings of King do not
cure the noted shortcomings in the teachings of Cyman and
Maruyama.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007