Ex Parte MCCRANK et al - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 2003-0495                                                                                  Page 3                     
                 Application No. 09/256,543                                                                                                       


                         A further understanding of the invention can be achieved by reading the following                                        
                 claim.                                                                                                                           
                         1. A method for detecting a synchronization signal within a plurality of                                                 
                         channels, comprising:                                                                                                    
                                  selecting a subset of the plurality of channels, wherein the subset                                             
                         includes more than one channel;                                                                                          
                                  determining substantially simultaneously if the synchronization                                                 
                         signal exists on at least one of the subset of channels; and                                                             
                                  initiating communications in response to determining that the                                                   
                         synchronization signal exists on at least one of the subset of channels.                                                 


                         Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by U.S.                                               
                 Patent No. 6,052,407  ("Ciccone").                                                                                               


                                                                  OPINION                                                                         
                         Our opinion addresses the claims in the following order:                                                                 
                         •        claims 1-7                                                                                                      
                         •        claims 8-20.                                                                                                    
                                                                A. CLAIMS 1-7                                                                     
                         "[T]o assure separate review by the Board of individual claims within each group                                         
                 of claims subject to a common ground of rejection, an appellant's brief to the Board                                             
                 must contain a clear statement for each rejection: (a) asserting that the patentability of                                       
                 claims within the group of claims subject to this rejection do not stand or fall together,                                       








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007