Ex Parte WEIRAUCH - Page 8



          Appeal No. 2003-0779                                                        
          Application 09/286,413                                                      

          Appellant responds that this statement by the examiner is                   
          not supported by this record, and that the examiner has failed to           
          establish a prima facie case of the obviousness of the claimed              
          invention.  Appellant also asserts that CD and DVD players for              
          audio and video expect every sector to have data.  Appellant                
          argues that the hard disk format taught by Dobbek has separate              
          dedicated servo sectors that prevent the data sectors from being            
          contiguous [reply brief].                                                   
          We will not sustain this rejection of the claims for                        
          essentially the reasons argued by appellant in the briefs.  The             
          examiner has improperly reduced the claimed invention to a                  
          concept and then attempted to find that concept instead of                  
          considering the specific language of the claimed invention.  As             
          argued by appellant, each of the claims on appeal recites                   
          contiguous data in the user-data area of the disk.  Dobbek                  
          discloses a disk which clearly has servo sector data positioned             
          within the user-data of the disk.  Thus, we agree with appellant            
          that Dobbek does not teach or suggest the claimed contiguous data           
          in the user-data of the disk.  The examiner’s position that every           
          disk must have servo data positioned within the user-data area of           
          the disk is not supported by any evidence on this record.  To the           
          contrary, appellant has submitted evidence in support of                    
                                         -8-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007