Ex Parte Hammon et al - Page 1





                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                                       
                           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                       

                                                                                                 Paper No. 21                                       

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                         
                                                             _______________                                                                        

                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                          
                                                             _______________                                                                        

                                                     Ex Parte ULRICH HAMMON,                                                                        
                                          HOLGER HERBST and GERHARD NESTLER                                                                         
                                                             _______________                                                                        

                                                          Appeal No. 2003-0849                                                                      
                                                          Application 09/622,916                                                                    
                                                             _______________                                                                        

                                                      HEARD: November 18, 2003                                                                      
                                                             _______________                                                                        

                   Before WALTZ1, KRATZ and  JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                                                
                   Judges.                                                                                                                          

                   JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   


                                              Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                                                              

                           Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 1 to                                             

                   15, all of the pending claims in the application.2  We have jurisdiction under 35                                                

                   U.S.C. § 134.                                                                                                                    


                           1 Paul Lieberman, Administrative Patent Judge, who participated in the oral hearing for this appeal,                     
                   is now retired.  Therefore, Thomas A. Waltz, Administrative Patent Judge, has been added to the panel for                        
                   participation in the subject decision.  Reargument is not required.  See In re Bose Corp., 772 F.2d 866, 869,                    
                   227 USPQ 1, 4 (Fed. Cir. 1985).                                                                                                  
                           2  In rendering our decision we have considered Appellants’ position present in the Brief, filed                         
                   March 26, 2002 and the Reply Brief, filed July 17, 2002.                                                                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007