Ex Parte Kaup - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2003-1692                                                        
          Application No. 09/835,347                                                  


          reference discloses, expressly or under the principles of                   
          inherency, each and every element of a claimed invention as well            
          as disclosing structure which is capable of performing the                  
          recited functional limitations.  RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital               
          Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed.               
          Cir.); cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 (1984); W.L. Gore and                 
          Assoc., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1554, 220 USPQ 303,           
          313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984).                    
               It is the examiner’s position that Yamaguchi anticipates the           
          instant claimed invention for the reasons set forth on page 4 of            
          the answer.  In particular, the examiner cites column 1, lines              
          18-25, column 2, lines 53-68, columns 18-19, and column 21, line            
          59 through column 22, line 18, of Yamaguchi for the claimed                 
          feature of                                                                  
               determining at least one object picture block, the at                  
               least one object picture block being at least one                      
               picture block with at least one object pixel;                          
               performing the step of determining the at least one                    
               object picture block such that a relative position of                  
               an edge of an object picture block of the digitized                    
               picture in relation to the digitized picture                           
               corresponds to a relative position of an edge of an                    
               object picture block of a chronologically preceding                    
               picture in relation to the chronologically preceding                   
               picture...                                                             

               Appellant’s position is that, contrary to the examiner’s               

                                         -3–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007