Ex Parte BAUMAN et al - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                               Paper No. 14              
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                      ____________                                                       
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                       
                  Ex parte MARK LINUS BAUMAN, PATRICK S. BOTZ, and WILLIAM CRAIG RAPP                                    
                                                      ____________                                                       
                                                  Appeal No. 2003-1729                                                   
                                               Application No. 09/229,733                                                
                                                      ____________                                                       
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                      ____________                                                       
              Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
              BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        


                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     A patent examiner rejected claims 1-30.  The appellants appeal therefrom under                      
              35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                                           


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention at issue on appeal concerns user authentication in a distributed                      
              computing environment.  (Appeal Br. at 4.)  Usage of distributed computing                                 
              environments such as the Internet is increasing at a prodigious rate.  In particular,                      
              conducting commerce ("e-business") in such environments continues to gain in                               
              popularity.  (Spec. at 1.)                                                                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007