Ex Parte CHANDRA et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2003-1873                                                        
          Application 09/281,420                                                      

                                     References                                       

               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:               
               Bishop et al. (Bishop)        4,958,284      Sept. 18, 1990            
               McMillen et al. (McMillen)    5,321,813      Jun.  14, 1994            
               Schoolcraft                   5,729,751      Mar.  17, 1998            

                                 Rejections At Issue                                  

               Claims 1-3, 6-8, 10-15, 17-18, 24-25, 27-29, 32-34, 36-41,             
          43-44, and 50-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          obvious over the combination of Bishop and Schoolcraft.                     

               Claims 19-21, 26, 45-47, and 52 stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over the combination of Bishop             
          and Schoolcraft and McMillen.                                               

               Throughout our opinion, we make references to the                      
          Appellants’ briefs, and to the Examiner’s Answer for the                    
          respective details thereof.1                                                


          1 Appellants filed an appeal brief on December 16, 2002.                    
          Appellants filed a reply brief on April 30, 2003.  The Examiner             
          mailed out an Examiner’s Answer on February 26, 2003.                       
                                          3                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007