Ex Parte Randall et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2003-1885                                                       
         Application No. 09/837,226                                                 


         and a polymer latex binder (Brief, page 2).  Representative                
         independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                   
              1.  A moisture-tolerant structural panel comprising                   
         (1) a gypsum core; and                                                     
         (2) a coated mat comprising fibers adhered to at least one                 
         surface of said gypsum core;                                               
              the coated mat having a coating comprising a combination              
         of (i) a mineral pigment, (ii) an inorganic adhesive binder and            
         (iii) a polymer latex adhesive binder.                                     
              The examiner has relied upon the following references as              
         evidence of obviousness:                                                   
         Ramig, Jr. et al. (Ramig)       3,945,965          Mar. 23, 1976           
         Gay et al. (Gay)                5,112,678          May 12, 1992            
         Randall                         5,342,680          Aug. 30, 1994           
         Green et al. (Green)            5,397,631          Mar. 14, 1995           
         Jaffee                          5,772,846          Jun. 30, 1998           
              Claims 1, 2, 4-11, 13-15, 17, 18 and 21-27 stand rejected             
         under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Green in view of Gay         
         (Answer, page 3).  Claims 3 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.          
         § 103(a) as unpatentable over Green in view of Gay and Jafee               
         (Answer, page 5).  Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
         § 103(a) as unpatentable over Green in view of Gay and Randall             
         (id.).  Claims 19, 20 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
         § 103(a) as unpatentable over Green in view of Gay and Ramig               
         (Answer, page 6).                                                          

                                         2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007