Ex Parte Robertson et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                         
          today was not written for publication and is not binding                     
          precedent of the Board.                                                      

                                                             Paper No. 13              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       
                              Ex parte JOHN A. ROBERTSON                               
                                         and                                           
                                   EDWARD S. O’NEAL                                    
                                      __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 2003-1983                                  
                                Application 09/704,077                                 
                                      __________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                      __________                                       

          Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, KRATZ and POTEATE, Administrative Patent            
          Judges.                                                                      
          POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                  
          rejection of claims 9-17 and 22.  Claims 18-21 are also pending              
          but have been withdrawn from consideration as directed to a non-             
          elected invention.  See Examiner’s Answer, Paper No. 11, mailed              
          April 16, 2003, page 1.                                                      

                                           1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007