Ex Parte VON BROCKDORFF - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-2102                                        Page 2           
          Application No. 09/254,723                                                   


                                      BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants' invention relates to cashless payment by means              
          of a mobile radio apparatus.  An understanding of the invention              
          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                 
          reproduced as follows:                                                       
               1.  A method for cashless payment, comprising the steps of:             
               establishing communication from a multifunction chipcard in             
          a user terminal via a wireless connection to a mobile radio                  
          network;                                                                     
               entering a personal identification feature at the user                  
          terminal;                                                                    
               registering the user terminal with the mobile radio network             
          and booking the user terminal into the mobile radio network;                 
               setting up a call via the mobile radio network from the user            
          terminal to a business terminal;                                             
               carrying out a credit rating check with a card number stored            
          in the chipcard;                                                             
               displaying an amount of money entered at the business                   
          terminal at the user terminal via the call; and                              
               releasing the amount of money for payment if a positive                 
          result of the credit rating check occurs after a confirmation at             
          the user terminal.                                                           
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                               
          Vazvan                        WO 96/13814          May   9, 1996             
          Heinonen et al. (Heinonen)    WO 96/25828          Aug. 22, 1996             









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007