Ex Parte Lam et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-2106                                                        
          Application No. 09/604,662                                                  

          1.  An apparatus comprising:                                                
               a first optical waveguide producing a first optical output;            
               a first electrode substantially parallel to the first                  
          waveguide;                                                                  
               a second optical waveguide producing a second optical output;          
               a second electrode substantially parallel to the second                
          waveguide; and                                                              
               a photo detector in the path of an interference pattern                
          produced by the first and second optical outputs.                           
          20.  A method of measuring an input signal, comprising:                     
               producing an interference pattern based on the input signal;           
               detecting a location of a null of the interference pattern;            
          and producing an output signal based on the location of the null.           
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Geary                    4,747,688                May  31, 1988             
          Leuchs et al. (Leuchs)   5,172,185                Dec. 15, 1992             
               Claims 20 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as            
          being anticipated by Geary.                                                 
               Claims 1 through 6, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 21 through 23 stand             
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                
          appellants’ admitted prior art Figure 1 in view of Leuchs.                  
               Claims 7 through 12, 15, 18 and 19 stand rejected under 35             
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over appellants’ admitted             
          prior art Figure 1 in view of Leuchs and Geary.                             
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007