Ex Parte Sandhu - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0016                                                        
          Application No. 09/496,081                                                  


               a bottom capacitor plate consisting essentially of amorphous           
          TiN;                                                                        
               a layer of dielectric material overlying said bottom                   
          capacitor plate; and                                                        
               a top capacitor plate over lying [sic, overlying] said layer           
          of dielectric material                                                      
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Gonzalez et al. (Gonzalez)        5,168,073         Dec. 01, 1992           
          Sandhu et al. (Sandhu)            5,335,138         Aug. 02, 1994           
          Lee et al. (Lee)                  2,245,762         Jan. 01, 1992           
          (United Kingdom Patent Application)                                         
               Appellant's claimed invention is directed to a capacitor in            
          a semiconductor device wherein the capacitor comprises, inter               
          alia, a bottom capacitor plate consisting essentially of                    
          amorphous TiN.  According to appellant, "[t]he capacitor will               
          function as a storage capacitor for a semiconductor device and              
          particularly for a dynamic random access memory device" (page 2             
          of principal brief, paragraph five).                                        
               Appealed claims 32, 36, 39 and 43 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gonzales in view of              
          Lee.  Claims 37, 38, 44 and 45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Gonzales in view of Lee and                
          Sandhu.                                                                     


                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007