The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSHIAKI YOSHIHARA, AKIHIRO MOCHIZUKI,
HIRONORI SHIROTO, TETSUYA MAKINO and YOSHINORI KIYOTA
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0045
Application No. 09/044,421
____________
HEARD: May 6, 2004
____________
Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4-10, and 12-16. Claims 3, 11, and 17 have been
canceled. Claim 18 has been indicated by the Examiner to be
allowable subject to being rewritten in independent form.
The disclosed invention relates to a liquid crystal display
(LCD) device and method utilizing dual scan writing and erasing.
During a display writing scan, an amount of voltage is applied to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007