Ex Parte MAURER - Page 2





            Appeal No. 2004-0204                                                                              
            Application No. 09/231,128                                                                        

                   Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                               
                   1.    An apparatus for detecting content based defects in a video stream                   
                         comprising:                                                                          
                         means for detecting a specified content characteristic in the video stream;          
                         means for determining whether the specified content characteristic meets             
                         a predetermined alarm criterion; and                                                 
                         means for reporting an error when the predetermined alarm criterion is               
                         met.                                                                                 
                   The examiner relies on the following references:                                           
            Tamer                                  4,430,671                 Feb.   7, 1984                   
            Rao et al. (Rao)                       6,041,142                 Mar. 21, 2000                    
                                                                       (Filed Apr. 8, 1996)                   
            Hasegawa                               6,075,552                 Jun.  13, 2000                   
                                                                       (Filed Jun. 11, 1997)                  
            Dimitrova et al. (Dimitrova)           6,100,941                 Aug.   8, 2000                   
                                                                       (Filed Jul. 28, 1998)                  
            Van De Schaar-Mitrea et al.                                                                       
            (Van De Schaar-Mitrea)                 6,175,386                 Jan. 16, 2001                    
                                                                       (Filed Jun. 2, 1998)                   

            Japanese Patent Application                                                                       
            Hirokawa                               JP9-266567-A              Oct. 7, 1997                     

                   Claims 1 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102 (e) as anticipated by                  
            Hasegawa.                                                                                         
                   Claims 1-3, 7-11, 14, 16 and 18-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103.  As                
            evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers Hasegawa with regard to claims 2, 16 and             
            19, adding Rao with regard to claims 1-3, 8, 9, 11/8 and 18-20.  The examiner offers              
                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007