Ex Parte Sundaresan - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0213                                                        
          Application No. 09/502,818                                                  

               1.  A system for automatically generating dynamic search               
          abstracts, comprising:                                                      
               a crawler for crawling documents and acquiring metadata and            
          link information from the documents;                                        
               a metadata repository for storing the metadata acquired by             
          the crawler;                                                                
               a link repository for storing link information acquired by             
          the crawler;                                                                
               an abstract engine for generating abstracts of the documents           
          from the metadata;                                                          
               an indexing engine for periodically indexing the metadata              
          and the link information;                                                   
               a search engine for applying a search query to the metadata            
          indexed by the indexing engine, to generate a preliminary result            
          set containing selected abstracts; and                                      
               wherein the search engine inquires if the link repository              
          contains new link information about the preliminary result set,             
          and updates the selected abstracts based on the new link                    
          information, if any, to generate the dynamic search abstracts.              
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Nasr et al. (Nasr)            6,263,332           Jul. 17, 2001             
                                                  (filed Aug. 14, 1998)               
          Kravets et al. (Kravets)      6,363,377           Mar. 26, 2002             
                                                  (filed Dec. 22, 1998)               
               Claims 1 through 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          being unpatentable over Kravets in view of Nasr.                            
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 9,               
          mailed April 29, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in             

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007