The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DOMENIC BELCASTRO
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0235
Application No. 09/873,583
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 21 to
24, 29, 30 and 37 to 41.1 Claims 25 to 28 and 31 to 36 have been objected to as
depending from a non-allowed claim. Claims 1 to 20 have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
1 While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment after final rejection to claim 41 (Paper
No. 10, filed September 12, 1995), we note that this amendment has not been clerically entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007