Ex Parte DALES - Page 2


               Appeal No. 2004-0245                                                                                                  
               Application 09/265,926                                                                                                

               antiviral agents famciclovir (appealed claim 6) and penciclovir (appealed claim 7) (specification,                    
               page 1, lines 11-14 and 26-28, page 4, and page 6, last structural formula (famciclovir)).  The                       
               reaction schemes begin with the synthesis of an intermediate compound of formula (I) which                            
               encompasses the compound of appealed claim 5 when formula members “R1” and “R3” are                                   
               methyl and amino, respectively.  The compound of claim 5 is structurally depicted as the second                       
               appearing structural formula in “scheme 2” on page 6 of the specification.                                            
                       The reference relied on by the examiner is:                                                                   
               Grinter et al. (Grinter)1                       0 302 644                            Feb. 8, 1989                    
                       (published European Patent Application)                                                                       
                       The examiner has rejected appealed product claim 5 over Grinter as anticipated under                          
               35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) (answer, pages 3-6).  The examiner                         
               has rejected appealed process claims 6, 7 and 10 through 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                         
               unpatentable over Grinter (answer, pages 6-13).                                                                       
                       Appellant groups appealed claim 5 and appealed claims 6, 7 and 10 through 13 according                        
               to the respective grounds of rejection (brief, page 2).  Thus, we decide this appeal based on                         
               representative appealed independent claims 5 and 10.  37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) (2001).                                    
                       We affirm the grounds of rejection under § 103(a) and reverse the ground of rejection                         
               under § 102(b).                                                                                                       
                       Rather than reiterate the respective positions advanced by the examiner and appellant, we                     
               refer to the examiner’s answer and to appellant’s brief for a complete exposition thereof.                            
                                                              Opinion                                                                
                       The claimed process schemes of appealed claim 10 begin with the sequence “(i)” of                             
               coupling of a 6-chloro-purine derivative of formula (II) with a tri-carboxylate derivative of                         
               formula (V) to obtain a 6-chloropurine derivative intermediate having a tri-carboxylate                               
               containing moiety in the “9” position encompassed by formula (VI), which is decarboxylated to                         
               obtain a 6-chloro-purine derivative intermediate with a di-carboxylate containing moiety in the                       
               “9” position encompassed by formula (I).                                                                              
                                                                                                                                    
               1  The patent literature family of Grinter includes United States Patent No. 5,175,288 (‘288                          
               patent), issued December 29, 1992. See page 1, lines 17-18, of the present specification.                             


                                                                - 2 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007