Ex Parte Hoskins et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0292                                                        
          Application 09/726,369                                                      


               Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                            
               1.  A method for optimizing access operations to and from a            
          data storage disc comprising steps of:                                      
               (a) calculating which data sectors to be accessed are on a             
          given track;                                                                
               (b) constructing a skip mask according to the sectors to be            
          accessed on the track;                                                      
               (c) pointing to a first skip mask bit in the skip mask with            
          a skip mask pointer;                                                        
               (d) interpreting a current bit pointed to in the skip mask;            
               (e) transferring data in the data sector if the current bit            
          is one; and                                                                 
               (f) incrementing the skip mask pointer to a next mask bit.             
               The following references have been relied on by the examiner           
          in the final rejection:                                                     
          “Automated Hardware Processing of Direct Access Storage Device              
          Skip Masks” (AHP), 39 IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, no. 5,             
          May 1996, pp. 121-22                                                        
          “Skip Mask Operation in a No-ID Disk Drive” (SMO), 39 IBM                   
          Technical Disclosure Bulletin, no. 6, June 1996, pp. 47-50                  

               Claims 1, 2 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as           
          being anticipated by AHP.  As clarified by the examiner in the              



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007