Ex Parte Rosenbloom - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           
                                                                                        Paper No. 15                    
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                     __________                                                         
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                                         Ex parte RICHARD ROSENBLOOM                                                    
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 2004-0340                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/847,121                                                 
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                 Before MILLS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
                 GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                          
                 final rejection of claims 1-6, 10, 12, 13, and 15.  Claims 7-9, 11, and 14 are also                    
                 pending but have been withdrawn from consideration.  Claim 1 is representative                         
                 and reads as follows:                                                                                  
                        1.     A composition for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy by a method                       
                 of administration selected from the group consisting of oral administration,                           
                 parenteral administration and inhalation, the composition comprising a mixture of                      
                 an amount of a compound that promotes synthesis of nerve growth factor                                 
                 selected from the group consisting of vitamin D3, 1(S), 3(R)-dihydroxy-20(R)-(1-                       
                 ethoxy-5-ethyl-5-hydroxy-2- heptyn-1-yl)-9, 10-seco-pregna-5(Z), 7(E), 10 (19)-                        
                 triene, pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof and mixtures thereof, which is                       
                 effective when administered in the composition to promote synthesis of nerve                           
                 growth factor, an amount of an aldose reductase inhibitor which is effective when                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007