Ex Parte JOHNSTON - Page 1




                    The opinion in support of the decision being                      
                    entered today was not written for publication                     
          and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                               Paper No. 31           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                           Ex parte ROBERT H. JOHNSTON                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2004-0404                                  
                             Application No. 08/992,878                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Robert H. Johnston originally took this appeal from the                
          final rejection (Paper No. 20) of claims 1, 3, 6, 8 and 19, all             
          of the claims pending in the application.  Upon consideration of            
          the appellant’s main brief (Paper No. 23), the examiner issued an           
          Office action (Paper No. 24) reopening prosecution and entering a           
          superseding rejection of the claims.  Pursuant to 37 CFR                    
          § 1.193(b)(2)(ii), the appellant then filed a supplemental brief            
          (Paper No. 26) with a request that the appeal be reinstated.                
          Implicitly granting the request, the examiner entered an answer             
          (Paper No. 27), noted a reply brief (Paper No. 28) filed by the             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007