Ex Parte Bice et al - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 
                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                            Paper No. 19              

                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                     __________                                       

                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                              
                                AND INTERFERENCES                                     
                                      __________                                      
                    Ex parte JO-ANN E. BICE, STUART D. HELLRING,                      
                          TIMOTHY A. OKEL and JAMES R. HAHN                           
                                     ___________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2004-0448                                  
                             Application No. 09/636,311                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
          Before PAK, OWENS, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-17,                
          which are all of the claims in the application.                             
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a method for making a hydrophobic                 
          particulate inorganic oxide having a carbon content that is                 
          substantially non-extractable and an M1 Standard White Area of              
          less than 0.4%.1  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                  


               1 The procedure for determining the M1 Standard White Area             
          is described in the appellants’ specification (page 30, line 7 -            
          page 40, line 29).                                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007