Ex Parte Gillett et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0463                                                        
          Application 09/827,791                                                      


          semiconductor package which includes the leadframe.  Claim 1,               
          directed toward the leadframe, is illustrative:                             
               1.   A leadframe for a two-lead, surface-mounting, high                
          power semiconductor package, the leadframe comprising:                      
               a microstructure having parallel and respectively co-planar            
          upper and lower surfaces, including:                                        
               an I-shaped die pad having a head, a foot, and opposite                
          first and second sides;                                                     
               an elongate, straight first lead disposed at the foot of the           
          die pad, the first lead having a side aligned with the first side           
          of the pad, a proximal end proximate to the die pad, and an                 
          opposite, distal end; and                                                   
               an L-shaped second lead disposed at the foot of the die pad,           
          the second lead having a side aligned with the second side of the           
          die pad, a proximal end, an opposite, distal end, and a wire                
          bonding arm extending along the die pad in spaced relation                  
          thereto, the wire bonding arm defining the proximal end of the              
          second lead which is disposed proximate to the first lead.                  
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Magni                       6,281,566              Aug. 28, 2001            
          (filed Sep. 25, 1997)                                                       
          Huang                       6,384,472              May   7, 2002            
          (filed Mar. 24, 2000)                                                       
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:            
          claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 over the appellants’ prior art                    
          figures 1-3 (APAF 1-3) in view of Magni; claims 4 and 7 over                
          APAF 1-3 in view of Magni and Huang; claims 21, 23, 25, 26                  

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007