Ex Parte Hossain et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0627                                                        
          Application No. 09/766,965                                                  


               a first region of a second conductivity type formed in the             
          substrate and having a contact region for electrically coupling             
          to the channel;                                                             
               a second region of the first conductivity type formed within           
          the first region between the contact region and the channel; and            
               a field oxide region formed between the second region and              
          the contact region.                                                         
               The examiner relies upon the following reference in the                
          rejection of the appealed claims:                                           
          Williams et al.              5,156,989              Oct. 20, 1992           
          (Williams)                                                                  
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a high voltage            
          MOS device which has a high voltage breakdown and low on-state              
          resistance.  The device comprises, inter alia, a field oxide                
          region (122) formed between a region (108) having the same                  
          conductivity type as the substrate, which region is in another              
          region (113) of a second conductivity type, and a contact region            
          (106, 120).  According to appellants, field oxide layer 122                 
          consumes portions of the underlying layer 108 which results in              
          non-uniform doping concentrations throughout layer 108 "that                
          provides higher breakdown voltage and allows for lower on-state             
          resistance" (page 3 of Brief, third paragraph).                             
               Appealed claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)            
          as being anticipated by Williams.                                           


                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007