Ex Parte Chang - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2004-0723                                                               
          Application No. 09/768,974                                                         


          assembly (52) and a coil array (78) which is a generally D-shaped                  
          loop.  The coil array includes a first segment that is substan-                    
          tially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the E-block, and                  
          it is the first segment that moves the E-block relative to the                     
          storage disk.                                                                      
                Appealed claims 1-30, 35 and 37-39 stand rejected under                      
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Tohkairin.                              
                Appellant separately groups the claims on appeal as follows:                 
          (I) claims 13, 20, 23, 29 and 30;                                                  
                (II) claims 24-28, 37 and 38;                                                
                (III) claim 35;                                                              
                (IV) claim 39;                                                               
                (V) claims 1-9, 11, 12, 14-19, 21 and 22; and                                
                (VI) claim 10                                                                
          Accordingly, the claims of groups (I), (II) and (V) stand or fall                  
          together.                                                                          
                We have thoroughly reviewed the respective positions advanced                
          by appellant and the examiner.  As a result, we will not sustain                   
          the examiner's rejection of claims 1-9, 11, 12, 14-19, 21 and 22                   
          (group (V) and claim 10 (group (VI)).  We will, however, sustain                   
          the examiner's rejection of claims 13, 20, 23, 29 and 30 (group                    
          (I)); claims 24-28, 37 and 38 (group (II)); claim 35 (group (III))                 
          and claim 39 (group (IV)).                                                         
                                            -3-                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007