Ex Parte Searfoss - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                                                                                               Paper No. 16              

                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                     ____________                                                        
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                     ____________                                                        
                                           Ex parte TIMOTHY K. SEARFOSS                                                  
                                                     ____________                                                        
                                                 Appeal No. 2004-0729                                                    
                                               Application No. 09/957,202                                                
                                                     ____________                                                        
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                        
              Before ABRAMS, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         



                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2, 9 and                    
              10.  Claims 4-8 stand objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but                        
              are otherwise indicated as allowable and claims 11-20 stand allowed.  No other claims                      
              are pending in this application.                                                                           
                     We AFFIRM.                                                                                          


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007