Ex Parte DEATON - Page 26




          Appeal No. 2004-0786                                                        
          Application No. 08/935,116                                Page 26           


          patenting over claim 23 of U.S. Patent No. 5,305,196.  The                  
          examiner's position (answer, page 7) is that "it would be [sic]             
          obvious to add a terminal for a [sic] check transaction                     
          processing, database building and marketing method and system               
          utilizing automatic check reading."                                         
               Appellants' position (brief, pages 37 and 38) is that the              
          system defined by claim 23 does not include “means or a terminal            
          for entering customer transaction data at the point-of-sale in              
          the retail establishment; it does not have (1) a processor and a            
          memory responsive to the apparatus for entering unique                      
          identification codes or (2) the terminal for entering customer              
          transaction data for creating a database of a plurality of the              
          retail establishment’s customers’ transaction data from prior               
          shopping visits; nor does it have circuitry responsive to said              
          processor, memory, and database for generating a customer                   
          information response signal at the point-of-sale during said                
          individual customer’s transaction in said retail establishment              
          upon detection of a unique identification code of said individual           
          customer, said signal being related to said individual customer’s           
          transaction data in shopping visits prior to the current shopping           
          visit.”  It is argued (brief, page 39) that the burden is on the            
          examiner to show that the subject matter of the claims would have           







Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007