Appeal No. 2004-0798
Application No. 09/929,849
For these reasons, we reverse the examiner’s rejections
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) of: (i) claims 6 and 19 as unpatentable
over Rogers in view of Verley and Murthy; (ii) claim 4 as
unpatentable over Rogers in view of Verley and Murthy, and
further in view of Brewer; (iii) claims 2, 3, 5, and 7 as
unpatentable over Rogers in view of Verley and Murthy, and
further in view of Green, Wachi, and Rosen; (iv) claims 13, 17,
18, and 20 as unpatentable over Rogers in view of Verley and
Murthy, and further in view of Kamiyama and Anderson; and (v)
claims 14 through 16 as unpatentable over Rogers in view of
Verley, Murthy, and Kamiyama, and further in view of Green,
Wachi, and Rosen.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007