Ex Parte Beltz - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-1025                                                        
          Application No. 09/572,674                                                  


                         (a) a mouthpiece having an airway passage formed             
          therethrough,                                                               
                         (b) a shaft having one end secured within said               
          mouthpiece and a distal end configured for performing keyboard              
          entry, wherein said shaft includes a hollow portion aligned with            
          and fluidly connected to said airway passage, and                           
                         (c) a control module attached to said shaft,                 
          wherein in said module includes,                                            
                         i) a switching means fluidly connected to                    
          said hollow portion, wherein said switching means generates a               
          first signal in response to an air pressure signal initiated by             
          the person at said air passage,                                             
                         ii) at least one emitting means for                          
          transmitting the first signal and a second signal; and                      
               a reception unit with a first detector means for detecting             
          said first signal and a second detector means for detecting said            
          second signal.                                                              
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          De Bruyne                      4,758,691          Jul. 19, 1988             
          Sauer et al. (Sauer)           4,828,418          May   9, 1989             
          Koizumi et al. (Koizumi)       5,883,616          Mar. 16, 1999             
                                   THE REJECTION                                      
               Claims 1 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Koizumi, Sauer and De Bruyne.                    
               Attention is directed to the brief (Paper No. 12) and answer           
          (Paper No. 13) for the respective positions of the appellant and            
          examiner regarding the merits of this rejection.                            





                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007