Ex Parte Ikawa - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.       
                                                                Paper No. 22        
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                     
                                     ____________                                   
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                        
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                 
                                     ____________                                   
                               Ex parte MIKIHIRO IKAWA                              
                                     ____________                                   
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1099                               
                              Application No. 09/868,911                            
                                     ____________                                   
                                       ON BRIEF                                     
                                     ____________                                   
         Before OWENS, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.        
         WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                
              This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s           
         final rejection of claims 15 through 26, which are the only claims         
         pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to             
         35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                           
              According to appellant, the invention is directed to a method         
         and an apparatus for processing a linear groove in a resin skin            
         (Brief, page 3).  A more detailed understanding of the invention           
         may be gleaned from representative independent claims 15 (method)          
         and 18 (apparatus) as found in the Appendix to appellants’ Brief.          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007