Ex Parte KIST et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                                 Paper No. 22         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
              Ex parte THOMAS A. KIST, BURN L. LEWIS, and BRUCE D. LUCAS              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1117                                 
                              Application No. 09/348,425                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before FLEMING, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 22 through 31, which are all of the claims              
          pending in this application.                                                
               Appellants' invention relates to a speech recognition system           
          which identifies a voice command component specified by a command           
          grammar and a dictation component not specified by the command              
          grammar and executes the voice command component using the                  
          dictation component as an execution parameter of the voice                  
          command.  Claim 22 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and            
          it reads as follows:                                                        




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007