Ex Parte Pflug et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                 Paper No. 19         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                       Ex parte RAINER PFLUG, WOLFGANG MIEREISZ,                      
                                   and THOMAS MOTZ                                    
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1171                                 
                              Application No. 09/754,618                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: NOVEMBER 17, 2004                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  

               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                 
          through 11.  These claims constitute all of the claims in the               
          application.                                                                

               Appellants’ invention pertains to a thrust ball bearing and            
          to a scroll compressor.  A basic understanding of the invention             
          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1 and 7,                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007