The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROGER PATRICK BRUNNER
__________
Appeal No. 2004-1244
Application 10/085,280
___________
HEARD: August 17, 2004
___________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Roger Patrick Brunner originally took this appeal from the
final rejection (Paper No. 7) of claims 1 through 12, all of the
claims pending in the application. Upon consideration of the
appellant’s main brief (Paper No. 12), the examiner issued an
Office action (Paper No. 14) reopening prosecution and entering a
superseding rejection of the claims. Pursuant to 37 CFR
§ 1.193(b)(2)(ii), the appellant then filed a supplemental brief
(Paper No. 16) and requested that the appeal be reinstated.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007