Ex Parte SOKOLEAN - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2004-1312                                                               Page 2                
              Application No. 08/710,554                                                                               


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                     The appellant's invention relates to a contact element for providing heat transfer                
              from a heat transfer medium to a ceiling.  A copy of the dependent claims under appeal                   
              is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.  Claim 57, the only independent claim             
              on appeal, reads as follows:                                                                             
                            A contact element for providing heat transfer from a heat transfer medium                  
                     to a ceiling, said contact element comprising:                                                    
                            at least one guide for holding in heat-conducting contact a conduit through                
                     which a heat transfer medium flows; and                                                           
                            a contact panel in heat-conducting connection with the at least one guide                  
                     and having at least one contact surface, wherein the contact surface has a width                  
                     to define lateral edges and includes at least one flat adhesive depression                        
                     containing an adhesive means to provide an adhesive surface substantially flush                   
                     with the contact surface, wherein the adhesive surface is spaced away from the                    
                     lateral edges of the contact surface.                                                             


                     The rejections under appeal are as follows:                                                       
              1.     Claims 57 to 60, 62 and 64 to 69 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated                    
              by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over JP 56-160597 to                         
              Maeda.                                                                                                   
              2.     Claims 57 to 60, 62 and 64 to 69 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                      
              over US 2,625,378 to Nason in view of JP 5-138654 to Doi et al. (Doi).                                   
              3.     Claim 63 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nason in view of Doi                    
              and GB 2 036 840 A to Yeomans.                                                                           








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007