Ex Parte Hocker et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2004-1321                                                                 Page 2                
              Application No. 10/002,633                                                                                 


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellants' invention relates to an impingement flow for wall parts                             
              (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to                  
              the appellants' brief.                                                                                     


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                     
              appealed claims are:                                                                                       
              Ashiwake et al.                    5,365,400                           Nov. 15, 1994                       
              (Ashiwake)                                                                                                 
              Wettstein                          5,586,866                           Dec. 24, 1996                       
              Cermak                             GB 849,255                          Sept, 21, 1960                      
              Livingood et al., "Heat-Transfer Characteristics of a Single Circular Air Jet Impinging on                 
              a Concave Hemispherical Shell," Report No. NASA TM X-2859, August 1973                                     
              (Livingood)                                                                                                


                     Claims 1, 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated                      
              by Cermak.                                                                                                 


                     Claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                     
              over Cermak in view of Ashiwake.                                                                           











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007