Ex Parte Wagle et al - Page 3



         Appeal No. 2004-1378                                                       
         Application No. 09/761,724                                                 

              Appellants' claimed invention is directed to an inter-axle            
         differential assembly for a vehicular power transmission unit.             
         The assembly includes a lubrication pump which provides flow of            
         lubricant only during the differential action between the input            
         and output shafts.  The lubrication pump of the present invention          
         is a gerotor pump that includes a rotor drivingly coupled to the           
         input shaft and an impeller coupled to a first side gear.                  
              Appealed claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 and 11 stand rejected under             
         35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over JP '712 in view of           
         Kwasniewski and Dick.1                                                     
             Although appellants have set forth three groups of claims at          
         page 5 of the Brief, the examiner has properly held that all the           
         appealed claims stand or fall together with claim 11.  As                  
         explained by the examiner, the Argument section of appellants'             
         Brief fails to set forth an argument that is reasonably specific           
         to any particular claim on appeal.  Also, we note that appellants          
         have not contested the examiner's holding.                                 
              We have thoroughly reviewed each of appellants' arguments             
         for patentability.  However, we are in complete agreement with             
         the examiner that the claimed subject matter would have been               
         obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art within the meaning of          
              1 The examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 1 and 2          
         over Plantan (see page 3 of Answer, second paragraph).                     
                                        -3-                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007