Appeal No. 2004-1578
Application No. 09/204,837
system via the serial data channel 60, and is further capable of
sending and receiving data to and from the computer via the same
serial data channel (column 4, line 58 through column 5, line 30;
column 6, lines 17 through 29).
In view of the foregoing, the anticipation rejection of
claim 1 is sustained. The anticipation rejection of claims 2
through 13, 16 and 17 is likewise sustained because appellants
have chosen to let these claims stand or fall with claim 1
(supplemental brief, page 3).
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 13,
16 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §
1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007