Ex Parte FEST et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-1598                                                         
          Application No. 09/250,878                                                   

               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                 
               1.   A method for initializing a theft protection system of             
               an automobile, which comprises:                                         
                    sending a starting signal to a central control unit,               
               for initiating an initialization;                                       
                    transmitting a challenge signal from the central                   
               control unit over a data line;                                          
                    sending identification code signals to the central                 
               control unit from control units connected to the data line              
               and answering the challenge signal;                                     
                    providing at least one of the control units as an                  
               electronically coded plug part containing small electronics,            
               and pluggably and releasably connecting the coded plug part             
               to the data line in a location in the automobile being                  
               difficult to find; and                                                  
                    storing all of the identification code signals or                  
               information regarding all of the answering control units in             
               the central control unit as belonging to the theft                      
               protection system, for requesting identification code                   
               signals from all of the control units and checking them as              
               to authorization, during future authentication operations.              
               The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting            
          the claims:                                                                  
               Posner et al. (Posner)         5,254,842      Oct. 19, 1993             
               Bachhuber (Bachhuber ‘490)     5,675,490      Oct.  7, 1997             
               Bachhuber (Bachhuber ‘329)     5,796,329      Aug. 18, 1998             
                                              (filed Jul. 22, 1996)                    
               Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as               
          being unpatentable over Bachhuber ‘329 and Posner.                           

                                          2                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007