Ex Parte Mancuso et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          

                                                                  Paper No. 19         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                      ____________                                     
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                      ____________                                     
                      Ex parte ANTHONY J. MANCUSO and KEVIN GERACE                     
                                      ____________                                     
                                  Appeal No. 2004-1602                                 
                               Application No. 09/954,766                              
                                      ____________                                     
                                        ON BRIEF                                       
                                      ____________                                     
          Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent            
          Judges.                                                                      
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          


          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
               This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s             
          final rejection of claims 1 through 12, which are all of the claims          
          pending in this application (see the Brief, page 2).  We have                
          jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                    
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a free-           
          standing coil reel hold-down device which comprises a base plate             
          secured to a floor, a snubber arm pivotably mounted to the base              
          plate including first and second sections disposed at an obtuse              
          angle with respect to each other, and a stand-alone means for                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007